Monday, January 31, 2011

Senior update: flu or pneumonia and death from August 30, 2009, 13-Feb-2010

'S * report may include flu-like illness laboratory confirmation hospitalization data or data elements are or can be based on the syndromic must unload the combination.

* Laboratory confirmation plus influenza includes test (rapid flu test, RT-PCR, mussels, IFA or culture there are done.

Following table influenza laboratory confirmation was hospitalized, and the 2009 mortality rates, such as the H1N1 flu season is 30 May 2009 lists reported in the summary. CDC receives from the region of the United States. This table is week Friday morning 11 flu season 2009 - 2010, based on the new definition of the status report hospitalization and mortality rates effective August 30 updated the.

CDC uses traditional monitoring system he continue to monitor progress of year 2009 - 2010 influenza season. For more information about influenza surveillance including accountability and influenza hospitalization and associated death. Questions and answers: 2009 monitor, such as the H1N1 influenza activity.

2009 H1N1 hospitalization, and CDC in April, according to the August 2009 and number of deaths is available since the last update is available.

Please contact the Department of public health.

International 2009 H1N1 influenza infection if
See also: World Health Organization.

* Download the CDC report and hospital admissions and from the type of all death syndrome and the influenza subtypes laboratory 1) review influenza hospitalization and mortality or 2) pneumonia and influenza. Laboratory confirmation if only contained in this report, but will continue analyzes data from the CDC laboratory confirmation and syndromic hospitalization and death.


View the original article here

Sunday, January 30, 2011

Incubation period of influence

Influence, as most of us know, is the common name of influence; a viral infection that affects the respiratory system. The infection is not a problem for healthy individuals. All that suffering is a feeling of being sick and rotten for a few days. However, people already suffering from any disease or those who have, not a sound or a strong immune system, are those who are open to the risk of developing serious complications, once they influenced. We're here to get information about the incubation period of influence and we'll do the same. However, apart from that, I also discuss some of the symptoms of influenza, that is not can be aware of the Commons. This is to help you start early, medical care, to avoid the risk of fatal complications. Thus, awareness not only influence incubation period, but also learn how to prevent this disease and to treat it in time.

What is the incubation period of influence?

In General, patients of influence more difficult for the incubation period of 2 days. However, some cases are, where the period can vary from 1 to 4 days. Then, you for the info very short incubation period of influence. Now, as I mentioned before, we learn about the symptoms of this disease, a little of his time in treatment and recovery.

Symptoms of avian influenza

Influence and its symptoms are known to define suddenly, and for this reason it is important that you identify symptoms soon. A characteristic high fever is the influence of indication developed more prominent. Adults typically suffer from fever 101º F (cooling) and 103-105º F (39.5-40 5) is a range that is typical of children. The fever is once accompanied chills, headache, sweating and dry cough sometimes. Muscle aches and pains in the back, arms and legs are common and are therefore extend the tiredness and weakness. Children suffer especially vomiting and diarrhea, when they are attacked by viruses. Other symptoms include sneezing, nasal congestion, sore throat, loss of appetite and chest discomfort.

For more information, read:

Difference between colds and flu, seasonal flu symptoms swine flu symptoms treatment influence incubation period

Administer prescribed antiviral immediately after the onset of symptoms, it helps to reduce the duration of the disease. Side effects can come with the use of these drugs and it is therefore important to have a discussion with your doctor. At home, focus on making many liquids such as water, juice, hot soups, etc. Rest is equally important and very essential. Helps the immune system to resist infection and keep it to deteriorate. Pain and back, legs, etc can be supported through the use of over-the-counter medications.

More about: influence influenza home remedies colds and flu Remedy annual vaccination is the best way to build a protection against attacks of influenza virus. Consult the Ministry of health to the flu season that will have you vaccinated before this period. This gives body enough time to build antibodies against the virus. No vaccinations would 100% protection, especially for seniors. However, it's effectiveness in reducing the risk of infection and its gravity. Average recovery time depends on the type of influenza virus strains. The shaft bottom get resolved in approximately 3-5 days and a stronger may take about a week or so completely abandon the person.

Complete article on incubation period of influence, other methods to prevent the onset of the disease include instill personal hygiene, stay away from sick people, cover your nose and mouth only to sneezes or coughs, a balanced diet and a regular program for fiscal years.

Saturday, January 29, 2011

NEW: Association of American universities (AchA) flu vaccination hand paper.

This site is archived for historical purposes and is no longer supported or updated. Flu season 2010 - 2011, update, see the CDC seasonal flu.

Don't let ruin flu plan.

Influenza activity has decreased in recent weeks, the 2009 H1N1 influenza virus, overseas, illness, hospitalization and death even causes the spread and continue. Reported in recent years, several colleges and universities increase in influenza, campus activities. Is to estimate the activity of influenza experts from disease control is difficult scheduled flu activity center prevention (CDC) — 2009 H1N1 flu virus from or seasonal — you can see the big eruption also parts of the world, and continued throughout the week. This season 2009 struck the virus H1N1 virus youth, especially hard most of young people in the immune disease. For these reasons, all CDC and the American public health Association (AchA) College students to encourage and continue the Faculty and staff are universities and colleges 2009 ???? note from H1N1. Spring 2009 H1N1 2009 results in widespread for many diseases, "spring break" 2010 "almost spring break" of vaccination for international influenza expected number of students to travel nationwide and after the visit to H1N1 2009 is particularly important.

2009 Is available in the H1N1 flu vaccine and campus school clinic, doctor's offices, State and local health departments and many pharmacies. Vaccination is the best way to protect yourself against influenza H1N1 2009. This is especially important if you have such conditions increase the risk of serious complications from asthma, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, pregnancy, flu or hospitalization and other medical conditions.

In addition to follow these steps to protect from to get vaccinated, as well as extended to the flu and other diseases get also to break.

H1N1, with only about 2009 without , talk with the doctor, also when the other recommended routine vaccination, particularly overseas travel may have. For more information and a healthy travel recommendations for prevention of influenza and other diseases CDC Travelers health (www.cdc.gov/travel) of visited websites. In addition, spring break travel. You can find specific information from the people who stay sick or coughing and sneezing. Main methods of the spread of flu is through drops cough or sneeze. After coughing or sneezing especially good hygiene and practices wash hands with SOAP and water frequently. Rubs when SOAP and water are available, alcohol-based hand is useful. Our Organization to cover, coughing or sneezing. Wash hands frequently. Not share of drinking glasses and tableware-avoid drink drinks common container and food, both after the other. Stay home (or away from each other), sick is 24 hours after the fever to others to be nasty is is from to avoid.

Spring break hours rest, relaxation, friends, and family fun. Take the opportunity to get vaccinations before spring break, and protect the family friend for influenza H1N1 2009. Don't let ruin plans flu - 2009 H1N1 vaccine.


View the original article here

Friday, January 28, 2011

Update: download FluView maps and overview report for the week ending 20 February 2010, in

Translate Request has too much data
Parameter name: request
Translate Request has too much data
Parameter name: request
Translate Request has too much data
Parameter name: request

FluView: A Weekly Influenza Surveillance Report Prepared by the Influenza Division

All data are preliminary and may change as more reports are received.

During week 47 (November 21-27, 2010), influenza activity in the United States remained relatively low overall, but increased slightly in the Southeast.

Of the 3,430 specimens tested by U.S. World Health Organization (WHO) and National Respiratory and Enteric Virus Surveillance System (NREVSS) collaborating laboratories and reported to CDC/Influenza Division, 366 (10.7%) were positive for influenza.The proportion of deaths attributed to pneumonia and influenza (P&I) was below the epidemic threshold. No influenza-associated pediatric deaths were reported. The proportion of outpatient visits for influenza-like illness (ILI) was 1.9%, which is below the national baseline of 2.5%. One of the 10 regions (Region 4) reported ILI above region-specific baseline levels; one state experienced high ILI activity; one state experienced low ILI activity, and 48 states experienced minimal ILI activity.The geographic spread of influenza in one state was reported as regional, Puerto Rico and nine states reported local activity; the District of Columbia, Guam, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and 33 states reported sporadic activity; and seven states reported no influenza activity.HHS Surveillance Regions*Data for current weekData cumulative since October 3, 2010 (Week 40)Out-patient ILI†% positive for flu‡Number of jurisdictions reporting regional or widespread activity§A (H3)2009 A (H1N1)A(Subtyping not performed)BPediatric Deaths

WHO and NREVSS collaborating laboratories located in all 50 states and Washington D.C. report to CDC the number of respiratory specimens tested for influenza and the number positive by influenza type and subtype. The results of tests performed during the current week are summarized in the table below.

Positive specimens by type/subtype

The District of Columbia and 44 states from all 10 surveillance regions have reported laboratory-confirmed influenza this season. Region 4 in the Southeastern United States has accounted for 1,231 (69.7%) of all 1,766 reported influenza viruses this season, including 680 (88.2%) of the 771 influenza B viruses.


INFLUENZA Virus Isolated
View WHO-NREVSS Regional Bar Charts | View Chart Data | View Full Screen | View PowerPoint Presentation

This system tracks weekly counts of laboratory-confirmed influenza-associated hospitalizations and deaths and was implemented on August 30, 2009, during the 2009 pandemic, and ended on April 4, 2010. AHDRA surveillance during the 2010-11 season is being continued on a voluntary basis and 11 jurisdictions reported during week 47. From October 3-November 27, 2010, 271 laboratory-confirmed influenza associated hospitalizations and four laboratory-confirmed influenza associated deaths were reported to CDC.


Aggregate Hospital and Death Reporting
View Full Screen | View Chart Data | View PowerPoint Presentation

CDC has antigenically characterized 18 influenza viruses [four 2009 influenza A (H1N1) viruses, eight influenza A (H3N2) viruses, and six influenza B viruses] collected by U.S. laboratories since October 1, 2010.

Testing of 2009 influenza A (H1N1), influenza A (H3N2), and influenza B virus isolates for resistance to neuraminidase inhibitors (oseltamivir and zanamivir) is performed at CDC using a functional assay. Additional 2009 influenza A (H1N1) clinical samples are tested for a single known mutation in the neuraminidase protein of the virus that confers oseltamivir resistance (H275Y). The data summarized below combine the results of both test methods and includes samples that were tested as part of routine surveillance purposes; it does not include diagnostic testing specifically done because of clinical suspicion of antiviral resistance.

High levels of resistance to the adamantanes (amantadine and rimantadine) persist among 2009 influenza A (H1N1) and A (H3N2) viruses (the adamantanes are not effective against influenza B viruses) circulating globally. As a result of the sustained high levels of resistance, data from adamantane resistance testing are not presented weekly in the table below.

Samples tested (n)Resistant Viruses,
Number (%)Samples tested (n)Resistant Viruses, Number (%)

To prevent the spread of antiviral resistant virus strains, CDC reminds clinicians and the public of the need to continue hand and cough hygiene measures for the duration of any symptoms of influenza, even while taking antiviral medications. Additional information on antiviral recommendations for treatment and chemoprophylaxis of influenza virus infection is available at http://www.cdc.gov/flu/antivirals/index.htm.

During week 47, 6.0% of all deaths reported through the 122-Cities Mortality Reporting System were due to P&I. This percentage was below the epidemic threshold of 7.2% for week 47.

Pneumonia And Influenza Mortality
View Full Screen | View PowerPoint Presentation

No influenza-associated pediatric deaths were reported to CDC during week 47.

One death, associated with an influenza A virus for which the subtype was not determined, occurring during the 2010-2011 season has been reported.


Influenza-Associated Pediatric Mortality
View Full Screen | View PowerPoint Presentation

The Influenza Hospitalization Network (FluSurv-NET) conducts surveillance for population-based, laboratory-confirmed influenza-related hospitalizations in children (persons younger than 18 years) and adults. The network covers over 80 counties in the 10 Emerging Infections Program (EIP) states (CA, CO, CT, GA, MD, MN, NM, NY, OR, and TN) and six additional states (ID, MI, OH, OK, RI and UT). FluSurv-NET estimated hospitalization rates will be updated every two weeks starting later this season.

Nationwide during week 47, 1.9% of patient visits reported through the U.S. Outpatient Influenza-like Illness Surveillance Network (ILINet) were due to influenza-like illness (ILI). This percentage is below the national baseline of 2.5%.

national levels of ILI and ARI
View ILINet Regional Charts | View Chart Data | View Full Screen | View PowerPoint Presentation

On a regional level, the percentage of outpatient visits for ILI ranged from 0.4% to 3.2% during week 47. One of the 10 regions (Region 4) reported a proportion of outpatient visits for ILI above their region-specific baseline levels.

Data collected in ILINet are used to produce a measure of ILI activity* by state. Activity levels are based on the percent of outpatient visits in a state due to ILI and are compared to the average percent of ILI visits that occur during spring and fall weeks with little or no influenza virus circulation. Activity levels range from minimal, which would correspond to ILI activity from outpatient clinics being below the average, to high, which would correspond to ILI activity from outpatient clinics being much higher than the average. Because the clinical definition of ILI is very general, not all ILI is caused by influenza; however, when combined with laboratory data, the information on ILI activity provides a clear picture of influenza activity in the United States.

During week 47, the following ILI activity levels were experienced:

One state (Georgia) experienced high ILI activity. While influenza-like illness is a non-specific term and may be caused by a variety of organisms, the increase in ILI in Georgia has occurred at the same time as a significant increase in the number of reported influenza B virus infections.New York City and one state (Alabama) experienced low ILI activity.Forty-eight states experienced minimal ILI activity (Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming).Data were insufficient to calculate an ILI activity level from the District of Columbia.

Click on map to launch interactive tool

Click on map to launch interactive tool

The influenza activity reported by state and territorial epidemiologists indicates geographic spread of influenza viruses, but does not measure the severity of influenza activity.

During week 47, the following influenza activity was reported:

Regional influenza activity was reported by one state (Georgia).Local influenza activity was reported by Puerto Rico and nine states (Alabama, Connecticut, Hawaii, Louisiana, Mississippi, New York, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, and South Carolina).Sporadic influenza activity was reported by the District of Columbia, Guam, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and 33 states (Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Florida, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, North Carolina, Ohio, Oregon, Rhode Island, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming).No influenza activity was reported by seven states (Delaware, Iowa, Maine, Nebraska, North Dakota, South Dakota, and Vermont).

U. S. Map for Weekly Influenza Activity


View the original article here

Wednesday, January 26, 2011

Senior update: flu or pneumonia and death from August 30, 2009 January 6, 2010

'S * report may include flu-like illness laboratory confirmation hospitalization data or data elements are or can be based on the syndromic must unload the combination.

* Laboratory confirmation plus influenza includes test (rapid flu test, RT-PCR, mussels, IFA or culture there are done.

Following table influenza laboratory confirmation was hospitalized, and the 2009 mortality rates, such as the H1N1 flu season is 30 May 2009 lists reported in the summary. CDC receives from the region of the United States. This table is week Friday morning 11 flu season 2009 - 2010, based on the new definition of the status report hospitalization and mortality rates effective August 30 updated the.

CDC uses traditional monitoring system he continue to monitor progress of year 2009 - 2010 influenza season. For more information about influenza surveillance including accountability and influenza hospitalization and associated death. Questions and answers: 2009 monitor, such as the H1N1 influenza activity.

2009 H1N1 hospitalization, and CDC in April, according to the August 2009 and number of deaths is available since the last update is available.

Please contact the Department of public health.

International 2009 H1N1 influenza infection if
See also: World Health Organization.

* Download the CDC report and hospital admissions and from the type of all death syndrome and the influenza subtypes laboratory 1) review influenza hospitalization and mortality or 2) pneumonia and influenza. Laboratory confirmation if only contained in this report, but will continue analyzes data from the CDC laboratory confirmation and syndromic hospitalization and death.


View the original article here

Tuesday, January 25, 2011

MMWR: A (H1N1) 2009 monovalent prevent vaccination campaign - Arab, Illinois, October 16th to December 31, the target region of 2009.

Translate Request has too much data
Parameter name: request
Translate Request has too much data
Parameter name: request
Translate Request has too much data
Parameter name: request

On July 29, 2009, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommended a phased approach for administration of influenza A (H1N1) 2009 monovalent vaccine, with certain high-risk groups* in the United States receiving the first doses (1). In Illinois, state authorities gave responsibility for initial vaccine administration to local health departments and hospitals. This report describes the vaccination campaign of the Skokie Health Department (SHD), during October 16--December 31, 2009. The SHD campaign initially was planned to cover the 67,000 persons residing in Skokie only, but that plan was expanded on November 4, when, in response to a nationwide vaccine shortage, the state health director urged local health departments to vaccinate any person in the ACIP priority groups regardless of jurisdictional boundaries. SHD, with the assistance of 1,075 volunteers, either administered or distributed to medical providers 40,850 H1N1 vaccine doses during a 9-week period, including 8,904 doses administered at 52 Skokie schools and day-care facilities, and 12,876 doses at mass vaccination clinics visited by residents of 193 of the 1,313 Illinois municipalities. At the time of the campaign, widespread illness from 2009 H1N1 in Illinois, with highly publicized deaths, contributed to a public sense of urgency about vaccination. Consistent with published studies (2,3), mass clinics in Skokie were an effective means to vaccinate large populations rapidly. The campaign highlighted the need for flexible plans, including the possibility of vaccinating persons who resided well beyond SHD's jurisdictional borders.

SHD is one of six state-certified local health departments in Cook County, Illinois, and typically administers 3,000 seasonal influenza vaccinations each year. Beginning in July 2009, following ACIP guidelines, SHD staff members used census data and direct contacts with schools and medical practices to estimate that 38,900 residents and commuters† were members of the initial priority groups recommended by ACIP for vaccination, including 14,900 children in schools or day-care facilities. Based on priority group calculations, on September 27, SHD ordered 40,000 doses of influenza A (H1N1) 2009 monovalent vaccine through the Illinois Department of Public Health (IDPH). SHD initially targeted children in schools and day-care facilities. Planners anticipated that area health-care providers and retail pharmacies would have sufficient vaccine by mid-October to begin vaccinating the other high-risk target groups. SHD mass clinics were scheduled for early December to ensure all residents would have access to the vaccine. During October 5--16, SHD received 15,000 doses for schools and day-care facilities, 67% of the doses in the nasal spray formulation. SHD received an additional 25,000 doses during November 6--16. In all, SHD administered or distributed 40,850 doses,§ in what evolved into a five-phase campaign (Figure 1, Table) that resulted in SHD administering influenza A (H1N1) 2009 monovalent vaccine to persons who resided far beyond the village boundaries (Figure 2). Overall, 54% of vaccine recipients at SHD clinics were not residents of Skokie.

Five-Phase Campaign

Phase 1. Vaccination clinics were held during October 21--November 20 at 39 public and private schools and 13 day-care facilities in Skokie. Vaccinations were offered to children, staff members, and caregivers of children aged <6 months. Overall, 8,904 persons received vaccine, 53% of the estimated target population. At school clinics, a greater percentage of persons aged =19 years (71%) received vaccine than persons aged 6 months--18 years (49%), based on the actual target populations. Among those vaccinated at school and day-care clinics, 40% resided outside of Skokie.

Phase 2. During October 16--November 24, SHD administered 2009 H1N1 vaccinations to persons who volunteered to assist in the vaccination campaign. SHD also offered vaccine to emergency medical services (EMS) personnel from Skokie and seven neighboring municipalities, and a regional private helicopter 911 service. Altogether, SHD vaccinated 254 EMS workers, or 24% of the actual target population; 179 (70%) worked for municipalities other than Skokie.

Phase 3. During November 9--25, because approximately 48% of the vaccine allocated for schools had not been utilized, a total of 8,141 doses were distributed to 30 Skokie medical practices that had placed vaccine orders with IDPH; an additional 2,717 doses were distributed to a local hospital. Because of an ongoing national vaccine shortage and preferential ordering of single-dose syringes, which were not yet available, the medical practices had received only 3% of their 20,850 ordered doses by mid-November, and a four-hospital system in the area had received only 10% of 120,000 ordered doses. SHD did not collect information regarding the recipients of these vaccine doses; the medical practices signed an agreement with IDPH to abide by ACIP guidelines.

Phase 4. SHD conducted four mass vaccination clinics during December 3--12 that were open to anyone in the ACIP priority groups, ignoring jurisdictional borders as requested by IDPH. An online appointment system and a phone bank were established to schedule vaccinations, limiting participants to 600 per hour. At the clinics, 12,876 persons were vaccinated; 73% of recipients resided outside of Skokie.

SHD was able to modify procedures rapidly to improve clinic flow. For the first clinic, several hundred persons arrived well before the scheduled start time and could not be allowed to enter the building, which contributed to a slow start and resulting waits of 1--2 hours. For the remaining three clinics, SHD implemented refinements to reduce the entire vaccination process time to <30 minutes per vaccinee. Refinements included establishing an adults and teens express vaccination room, reorganizing patterns within the building to maintain a continuous flow, ensuring adequate staffing, and opening 1 hour earlier than scheduled to accommodate early arrivals. Overall, 25 persons were vaccinated per vaccinator, per hour.

Phase 5. During December 14--31, because of increased vaccine supply, IDPH opened 2009 H1N1 vaccinations to any person aged =6 months. SHD administered an additional 3,261 doses at the village hall, the public library, and to the homebound. At the same time, SHD distributed 3,780 doses to neighboring health departments, Skokie medical practices, and a long-term care facility.

Staffing and Communication

SHD, which has a staff of 18 persons, including one physician, two full-time nurses, and one part-time nurse, relied on 1,075 community volunteers to administer vaccinations and fill support roles; most of these persons had never served in large vaccination clinics and had no previous emergency preparedness training. Volunteer recruitment efforts included a letter from the mayor to all Skokie boards and commissions, Internet postings, e-mail requests, and broadcast messages on the local emergency radio station and cable television news. Recruiting messages described specific tasks that would be assigned to volunteer support staff members, such as assisting with completion of consent forms or movement of persons through the clinic. The 172 volunteer vaccinators included 108 nurses, 36 nursing students, 22 paramedics, four physicians, and two pharmacists; many volunteered on more than one occasion.

Teleconferencing was established and used along with mass e-mails for simultaneous communication with schools and day-care facilities. Local medical practices and retail pharmacies received regular updates via blast fax. Skokie residents and businesses were kept informed of the vaccination campaign through local newspapers, flyers, billboards, Internet postings, 10 radio station updates, five cable television spots, and 12 mass e-mailings. Twice, "reverse-911" calls with critical clinic information were sent to village businesses and residences. Monthly visits to the Village of Skokie website doubled during December, from 17,000 to 34,000. Chicago news coverage was instrumental in promoting the availability of vaccine in Skokie; within 4 days of Chicago news coverage, all mass clinic appointments had been filled. To defray costs of the campaign, SHD received $260,000 in federal Public Health Emergency Response funds, distributed through IDPH.

C Counard, MD, A Rigoni, MPA, J Lockerby, MPA, A Tennes, MPA, R Czerwiniski, D Prottsman, MPA, M Slankard, MPA, A LeTendre, MPA, B Silverberg, P Hanley, JD, H Mueller, JD, B Nowak, MBA, B Gilley, MIT, M Aleksic, M DiFrancesca, C Ballowe, B Johnson, MS, B Jones, S Reisberg, MSN, C Braden, MPH, J Hartford, B Neirick, D Codd, B Kok, D McLin, C Starks, J Gaulin, L Kaplan, M Maggi, D Mohrlein, H Coleman, P Staffney, J Prendi, MPA, L Gooris, K Norwood, J Silva, N Wyatt, H Peters, J Scher, B Riplinger, J Gill, J Lyerly, D Nygren, J Puff, L Rukavina, C Markoutsas, I Kalota, J Reichert, N Tharwani, S Collins, L Brangan, Village of Skokie. K Whitney, Municipal GIS Partners, Inc. D Nimke, MPH, private epidemiology contractor. C Conover, MD, LG Gallagher, MPH, K McMahon, Illinois Dept of Public Health. D Swerdlow, MD, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, CDC.

The 2009 H1N1 vaccination campaign presented substantial challenges to SHD. The initial, two-part plan devised in July was to offer vaccine first to children, the largest ACIP target population in Skokie, through school and day-care clinics during October and November. Planners anticipated that community medical providers would, at the same time, vaccinate members of the other ACIP priority groups, and SHD would finish up with four mass clinics in December, targeting Skokie residents who had not yet been vaccinated. However, because the vaccine shortage prevented many persons at high-risk for complications from 2009 H1N1 strain from getting vaccinated, the SHD plan quickly became to vaccinate a broader population as requested by IDPH, including persons who resided outside the village limits.

CDC has indicated previously that the convenience of school-located vaccination clinics might improve pediatric vaccination rates for seasonal influenza and during outbreaks of vaccine-preventable diseases (4). During an outbreak of pertussis at an Illinois high school, the vaccination rate among students, which had increased from 16% to 37% in the 3 months after parents and health-care providers were first notified, rose to 68% after a 4-day school-based vaccination clinic (5). The 49% 2009 H1N1 vaccination coverage among children in Skokie schools and day-care facilities is substantially higher than the preliminary vaccination rate estimates for this population nationally (36.8%) and in Illinois (37.5%) (6). However, caution should be used in comparing the Skokie coverage rate, which was calculated from administrative data, with national and state survey data.

Large numbers of community volunteers were essential to the success of the Skokie vaccination campaign; most were identified through established relationships. Effective use of volunteers during public health emergencies requires a clear organizational framework and well-defined job duties. This level of support will be required for future efforts to rapidly vaccinate the entire Village. Historic accounts of the 1918 influenza pandemic in the United States describe a similar reliance on volunteers to carry out local response efforts (7).

Rapid vaccination of the United States population during a pandemic is achieved through local efforts. SHD was able to quickly adjust its 2009 H1N1 vaccination plans at multiple junctures as the event unfolded and to provide vaccine to many persons not included in original plans. These adjustments were possible because of strong support from village officials of public health initiatives, an early commitment to administer 40,000 vaccine doses, and well-established lines of public health communication at the state and local level.

This report is based, in part, on contributions from school and day-care administrations and staff members, the Skokie Park District administration and staff members, and approximately 1,000 persons who volunteered their services to the vaccination campaign.

CDC. Use of influenza A (H1N1) 2009 monovalent vaccine: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), 2009. MMWR 2009;58(No. RR-10).Schwartz B, Wortley P. Mass vaccination for annual and pandemic influenza. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 2006;304:131--52.Fontanesi J, Hill L, Olson R, Bennett NM, Kopald D. Mass vaccination clinics versus appointments. J Med Pract Manage 2006;21:288--94.CDC. Prevention and control of seasonal influenza with vaccines: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). MMWR 2009;58(No. RR-8).CDC. Use of mass Tdap vaccination to control an outbreak of pertussis in a high school---Cook County, Illinois, September 2006--January 2007. MMWR 2008;57:796--9.CDC. Interim results: state-specific influenza A (H1N1) 2009 monovalent vaccination coverage---United States, October 2009--January 2010. MMWR 2010;59:363--8.Jones MM. The American Red Cross and local response to the 1918 influenza pandemic: a four-city case study. Public Health Rep 2010;125(Suppl 3):92--104.

What is already known?

Local health departments typically provide services based on jurisdictional borders; this policy presented a challenge to 2009 H1N1 vaccination campaigns.

What is added by this report?

The Skokie Health Department in Illinois rapidly modified existing plans to accommodate persons in vaccine priority groups from a wide geographic area; overall, 54% of vaccinations were administered to persons who resided outside of Skokie.

Implications for public health practice?

During pandemics, vaccine shortages are likely to occur; where appropriate and permissible, mass vaccination clinics that cross public health jurisdictional borders can improve access to vaccine.


FIGURE 1. Number of doses of influenza A (H1N1) 2009 monovalent vaccine administered or distributed by Skokie Health Departmnent (SHD), by date and campaign phase* --- Skokie, Illinois, October 16--December 31, 2009

The figure shows the number of doses of influenza A (H1N1) 2009 monovalent vaccine administered or distributed by Skokie Health Department (SHD), by date and campaign phase in Skokie, Illinois from October 16- December 31, 2009. In all, SHD administered or distributed 40,850 doses, in what evolved into a five-phase campaign.

Alternate Text: The figure above shows the number of doses of influenza A (H1N1) 2009 monovalent vaccine administered or distributed by Skokie Health Department (SHD), by date and campaign phase in Skokie, Illinois from October 16- December 31, 2009. In all, SHD administered or distributed 40,850 doses, in what evolved into a five-phase campaign.


Campaign phase

Period in 2009

Site

Recipient group

No. of doses administered or distributed

Neighboring health departments


FIGURE 2. Residences of Illinois recipients of doses* of influenza A (H1N1) 2009 monovalent vaccine administered by the Skokie Health Department --- Skokie, Illinois, October 16--December 31, 2009

The figure shows residences of Illinois recipients of doses of influenza A (H1N1) 2009 monovalent vaccine administered by the Skokie Health Department during October 16-December 31, 2009. In all, SHD administered or distributed<br />40,850 doses, in what evolved into a five-phase campaign that resulted in SHD administering influenza A (H1N1) 2009 monovalent vaccine to persons who resided far beyond the village boundaries.<br />

Alternate Text: The figure above shows residences of Illinois recipients of doses of influenza A (H1N1) 2009 monovalent vaccine administered by the Skokie Health Department during October 16-December 31, 2009. In all, SHD administered or distributed 40,850 doses, in what evolved into a five-phase campaign that resulted in SHD administering influenza A (H1N1) 2009 monovalent vaccine to persons who resided far beyond the village boundaries.


Use of trade names and commercial sources is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

References to non-CDC sites on the Internet are provided as a service to MMWR readers and do not constitute or imply endorsement of these organizations or their programs by CDC or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. CDC is not responsible for the content of pages found at these sites. URL addresses listed in MMWR were current as of the date of publication.

All MMWR HTML versions of articles are electronic conversions from typeset documents. This conversion might result in character translation or format errors in the HTML version. Users are referred to the electronic PDF version (http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr) and/or the original MMWR paper copy for printable versions of official text, figures, and tables. An original paper copy of this issue can be obtained from the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office (GPO), Washington, DC 20402-9371; telephone: (202) 512-1800. Contact GPO for current prices.

**Questions or messages regarding errors in formatting should be addressed to mmwrq@cdc.gov.


View the original article here

Monday, January 24, 2011

New: issue News & USA 2009 H1N1 cases, in response to expected number of seniors and death

Questions and answers

This site is archived for historical purposes and is no longer supported or updated. Flu season 2010 - 2011, update, see the CDC seasonal flu.

2009 March 12, 4: 00 pm et

12 Mar 2010 CDC update issued in February 2010 from United States 2009 April 13, 2009 estimate of the number of H1N1 hospitalization and death.

2009 13 Four-year period of February to CDC estimates 4, 2000000 and 86 million cases occurred H1N1 2009 years 2010. H1N1 infection in 2009 the average level in this range is about 59 people. Associated with H1N1 around 188. 000 389. 000 between hospitalization period 2009 occurred on February 1, 2010, CDC estimates. In this range average level 2009 H1N1 hospitalization related approximately 265 000 is. Between 5... 620 2009 H1N1-related deaths, 2009 period occurred on February 13, 2010 8... 520 for CDC estimates. Average level in this range is approximately 12 000 people are killed H1N1 2009.

If the CDC 2009 H1N1 hospitalization and death introduced the estimated number of April 17, 2009 updated November 12, 2009, the estimated value of approximately one month of these commitments. Estimate updated April 14, 2009 was released on December 10, 2009; estimates update for April 2008 in December on January 15, 2010 released; update on estimated April 2010 January 16th-2010 February 12, publishing the. Use the same technique Gets a rating for each set.

Recently on January 17, 2010 13 Feb 2010) from influenza data before 4 weeks estimated from release to 12 February 2010 forecast. Recent estimates hospitalization and mortality estimates after 2010, February 12, published 2009 shows the relatively small increase in the total number of H1N1, case.
View the data by age group. Further background about the methodology used to create these estimates and these ratings are available.

Latest estimated CDC 2009 and be affected by this illness 65 people people less than age 65 H1N1 cases, hospitalization and death continue more strictly in the old emphasized that compared with seasonal flu. Deaths occur this seasonal flu 60% and 90% of hospital admissions for influenza-related people in 65 years old and older and is in contrast to seasonal influenza. 65 And under the 2009 H1N1 around 90% of estimated hospitalization, and in February 2010, April 13, 2009 from 87% of the estimated number of death occurred. Severe infection and death from 2009 all ages including H1N1 65 years or older people, people 65 years by maximum burden was.

CDC is an ongoing vaccination H1N1 2009 old at this point everyone 6 months suggest, etc. are 65 and over more than a serious for this age at death and illness by . People with certain health current vaccination is especially important since most severe cases 2009 H1N1 hospitalization), such as in chronic disease patients has occurred. (To see. "2009 H1N1 influenza: hospital for adults and children between basic health. ") 2009 Medical conditions increase the risk of hospitalization in H1N1 in the lung disease asthma or chronic lung disease (COPD), diabetes, heart, nervous disorders, pregnancy. Also, minority groups (minorities, please see 2009 harder than the H1N1 pandemic has been hit. "Information impact 2009 H1N1, ethnicity or race) is a morbidly obese people serious complication 2009 some evidence to support higher risk in H1N1 early fears.

Vaccination and to have more chances to get infected with practice (ACIP), and July is very become ill priorities early 2009 H1N1 vaccine doses supports Advisory Board's recommendation. Young ages of all children and adults, pregnant women and adults between 25 and 64, medical health risk for complications of 24-year-old six months from the flu there. People 65 years old and is people of different ages can be sick but less so priority is initially old vaccination was. However, if you become ill people 65 and older age at risk of serious complications like reason, became ill if you have the antiviral drugs of the priorities of the people of this age group was realized. ACIP July meeting justified transcript (1 MB) and the slide presentation was discovered as a target group of initial vaccination. Once again ACIP Conference this meeting also is available at on the basis of this decision are listed in October 2009 and slide. 2009 Is online fully ACIP recommendations for using the H1N1 vaccine. People over 65 years old and of vaccine immunization involves people 65 and over old more than enough to protect against the virus of mass H1N1 2009, CDC encouraged vaccines for people who want to receive the first dose, was included in the original group. National influenza vaccination week (NIVW) during a special, 2010 (Thursday, January 15), is assigned for people 65 years or older to help increase the recognition of the importance of and old. CDC recommends every six months and keep older people 2009 H1N1 virus protection that injections, age matter.


View the original article here

Saturday, January 22, 2011

Update: download FluView maps and overview report for the week ending 17 April 2010

Translate Request has too much data
Parameter name: request
Translate Request has too much data
Parameter name: request
Translate Request has too much data
Parameter name: request

FluView: A Weekly Influenza Surveillance Report Prepared by the Influenza Division

All data are preliminary and may change as more reports are received.

During week 47 (November 21-27, 2010), influenza activity in the United States remained relatively low overall, but increased slightly in the Southeast.

Of the 3,430 specimens tested by U.S. World Health Organization (WHO) and National Respiratory and Enteric Virus Surveillance System (NREVSS) collaborating laboratories and reported to CDC/Influenza Division, 366 (10.7%) were positive for influenza.The proportion of deaths attributed to pneumonia and influenza (P&I) was below the epidemic threshold. No influenza-associated pediatric deaths were reported. The proportion of outpatient visits for influenza-like illness (ILI) was 1.9%, which is below the national baseline of 2.5%. One of the 10 regions (Region 4) reported ILI above region-specific baseline levels; one state experienced high ILI activity; one state experienced low ILI activity, and 48 states experienced minimal ILI activity.The geographic spread of influenza in one state was reported as regional, Puerto Rico and nine states reported local activity; the District of Columbia, Guam, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and 33 states reported sporadic activity; and seven states reported no influenza activity.HHS Surveillance Regions*Data for current weekData cumulative since October 3, 2010 (Week 40)Out-patient ILI†% positive for flu‡Number of jurisdictions reporting regional or widespread activity§A (H3)2009 A (H1N1)A(Subtyping not performed)BPediatric Deaths

WHO and NREVSS collaborating laboratories located in all 50 states and Washington D.C. report to CDC the number of respiratory specimens tested for influenza and the number positive by influenza type and subtype. The results of tests performed during the current week are summarized in the table below.

Positive specimens by type/subtype

The District of Columbia and 44 states from all 10 surveillance regions have reported laboratory-confirmed influenza this season. Region 4 in the Southeastern United States has accounted for 1,231 (69.7%) of all 1,766 reported influenza viruses this season, including 680 (88.2%) of the 771 influenza B viruses.


INFLUENZA Virus Isolated
View WHO-NREVSS Regional Bar Charts | View Chart Data | View Full Screen | View PowerPoint Presentation

This system tracks weekly counts of laboratory-confirmed influenza-associated hospitalizations and deaths and was implemented on August 30, 2009, during the 2009 pandemic, and ended on April 4, 2010. AHDRA surveillance during the 2010-11 season is being continued on a voluntary basis and 11 jurisdictions reported during week 47. From October 3-November 27, 2010, 271 laboratory-confirmed influenza associated hospitalizations and four laboratory-confirmed influenza associated deaths were reported to CDC.


Aggregate Hospital and Death Reporting
View Full Screen | View Chart Data | View PowerPoint Presentation

CDC has antigenically characterized 18 influenza viruses [four 2009 influenza A (H1N1) viruses, eight influenza A (H3N2) viruses, and six influenza B viruses] collected by U.S. laboratories since October 1, 2010.

Testing of 2009 influenza A (H1N1), influenza A (H3N2), and influenza B virus isolates for resistance to neuraminidase inhibitors (oseltamivir and zanamivir) is performed at CDC using a functional assay. Additional 2009 influenza A (H1N1) clinical samples are tested for a single known mutation in the neuraminidase protein of the virus that confers oseltamivir resistance (H275Y). The data summarized below combine the results of both test methods and includes samples that were tested as part of routine surveillance purposes; it does not include diagnostic testing specifically done because of clinical suspicion of antiviral resistance.

High levels of resistance to the adamantanes (amantadine and rimantadine) persist among 2009 influenza A (H1N1) and A (H3N2) viruses (the adamantanes are not effective against influenza B viruses) circulating globally. As a result of the sustained high levels of resistance, data from adamantane resistance testing are not presented weekly in the table below.

Samples tested (n)Resistant Viruses,
Number (%)Samples tested (n)Resistant Viruses, Number (%)

To prevent the spread of antiviral resistant virus strains, CDC reminds clinicians and the public of the need to continue hand and cough hygiene measures for the duration of any symptoms of influenza, even while taking antiviral medications. Additional information on antiviral recommendations for treatment and chemoprophylaxis of influenza virus infection is available at http://www.cdc.gov/flu/antivirals/index.htm.

During week 47, 6.0% of all deaths reported through the 122-Cities Mortality Reporting System were due to P&I. This percentage was below the epidemic threshold of 7.2% for week 47.

Pneumonia And Influenza Mortality
View Full Screen | View PowerPoint Presentation

No influenza-associated pediatric deaths were reported to CDC during week 47.

One death, associated with an influenza A virus for which the subtype was not determined, occurring during the 2010-2011 season has been reported.


Influenza-Associated Pediatric Mortality
View Full Screen | View PowerPoint Presentation

The Influenza Hospitalization Network (FluSurv-NET) conducts surveillance for population-based, laboratory-confirmed influenza-related hospitalizations in children (persons younger than 18 years) and adults. The network covers over 80 counties in the 10 Emerging Infections Program (EIP) states (CA, CO, CT, GA, MD, MN, NM, NY, OR, and TN) and six additional states (ID, MI, OH, OK, RI and UT). FluSurv-NET estimated hospitalization rates will be updated every two weeks starting later this season.

Nationwide during week 47, 1.9% of patient visits reported through the U.S. Outpatient Influenza-like Illness Surveillance Network (ILINet) were due to influenza-like illness (ILI). This percentage is below the national baseline of 2.5%.

national levels of ILI and ARI
View ILINet Regional Charts | View Chart Data | View Full Screen | View PowerPoint Presentation

On a regional level, the percentage of outpatient visits for ILI ranged from 0.4% to 3.2% during week 47. One of the 10 regions (Region 4) reported a proportion of outpatient visits for ILI above their region-specific baseline levels.

Data collected in ILINet are used to produce a measure of ILI activity* by state. Activity levels are based on the percent of outpatient visits in a state due to ILI and are compared to the average percent of ILI visits that occur during spring and fall weeks with little or no influenza virus circulation. Activity levels range from minimal, which would correspond to ILI activity from outpatient clinics being below the average, to high, which would correspond to ILI activity from outpatient clinics being much higher than the average. Because the clinical definition of ILI is very general, not all ILI is caused by influenza; however, when combined with laboratory data, the information on ILI activity provides a clear picture of influenza activity in the United States.

During week 47, the following ILI activity levels were experienced:

One state (Georgia) experienced high ILI activity. While influenza-like illness is a non-specific term and may be caused by a variety of organisms, the increase in ILI in Georgia has occurred at the same time as a significant increase in the number of reported influenza B virus infections.New York City and one state (Alabama) experienced low ILI activity.Forty-eight states experienced minimal ILI activity (Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming).Data were insufficient to calculate an ILI activity level from the District of Columbia.

Click on map to launch interactive tool

Click on map to launch interactive tool

The influenza activity reported by state and territorial epidemiologists indicates geographic spread of influenza viruses, but does not measure the severity of influenza activity.

During week 47, the following influenza activity was reported:

Regional influenza activity was reported by one state (Georgia).Local influenza activity was reported by Puerto Rico and nine states (Alabama, Connecticut, Hawaii, Louisiana, Mississippi, New York, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, and South Carolina).Sporadic influenza activity was reported by the District of Columbia, Guam, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and 33 states (Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Florida, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, North Carolina, Ohio, Oregon, Rhode Island, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming).No influenza activity was reported by seven states (Delaware, Iowa, Maine, Nebraska, North Dakota, South Dakota, and Vermont).

U. S. Map for Weekly Influenza Activity


View the original article here

Friday, January 21, 2011

Update: about the vaccine's doctors and medical professionals

This site is archived for historical purposes and is no longer supported or updated. Flu season 2010 - 2011, update, see the CDC seasonal flu.

CDC is recommended as protection against flu first and most important step in influenza vaccination. 2010-11 And the seasonal flu vaccine H1N1 influenza B 2009 protects against plus and H3N2 influenza strains. However, 2010 - 11 seasonal vaccines are normally available until no since September. 2009 Continues, will rest of H1N1 2009, the world recognized in cases of the H1N1; CDC seasonal flu vaccination 2009 H1N1 vaccines pending the users continue promoting and monovalent vaccine doses. Injection of getting 2009 H1N1 is especially important during this period.

Yet 2009 has received the H1N1 vaccine kids 8 years 6 months. They are when a dose of one of the seasonal vaccine available means 2009 do you want to get the H1N1 vaccine doses now. People from high risk for influenza complications but not 2009 H1N1 andPeople vaccine is the people who travel in areas affected /H1N1 2009. These are diseases of lung disease asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), diabetes, heart, or nervous system, seems to pregnant women.
Vaccine storage and return 30H1N1 vaccine Q & A November 11 20, policy FDA CSL limited to 6 months ™ 2009 H1N1 influenza vaccine 1 expand the population using old, December 10, 2009 H1N1 vaccine dose interval and other vaccine dose amount of H1N1 vaccine administration and vaccinations and administrative record 11 March 3 Influenza card October 29,
This is the updated version of the card supplier of vaccines currently distributed. Follow the instructions under printing if you need additional card provider. Instructions on printing: strength, better (and don't waste practice filing copy paper should be) card stock to print PDF of map entries to open. Do not use a scale of 100% of the size of the printed page, along the lines of the double side of the card, two-sided card stock trim, crop maps shown on the back printed pages. (Tip: avoid losing crops remaining lines first, cut the long split paths work long section of the two). 6 Cards, each 3 3 / 8 "4 1 / 4 x. Front panel you'll fold cards respectively as "flu vaccination records.

View the original article here

Thursday, January 20, 2011

2009 H1N1 influenza vaccine long and Q & A

Program 2009 learn about the H1N1 vaccine Rehab Center

2010 July 23, 12: 00 am EST

And seasonal influenza vaccine is unlike normal 30 June 2009 H1N1 influenza vaccine effective deadline, 2010 — at the beginning of February 2011 monovalent would expire. Sanofi Pasteur multi-dose Cork (MDV), in particular, 2011 expiry. Add 2009 H1N1 influenza activity (i.e., "third wave") spring and summer 2010 - 11 trivalent influenza vaccine is still not accessible through the year 2010 or early autumn 2010. Strain of influenza H1N1 2009 2010 - 11 and contains the seasonal flu vaccine production and availability still unknown when.

The purpose of this white paper is the vaccine.

Viable 2009 season (this 2009 H1N1 strain are included) need to destroy the 2010 - 11 until the sanofi pasteur MDV H1N1 vaccine is widely available. If the occurrence of the disease must retain until 2010 - 2011, vaccines have become available.

2010-2011 Season vaccine 2009 includes two other strains as well as the H1N1 strain. For this reason, 2009 not consider instead H1N1monovalent vaccine seasonal price vaccine. Used only when it disease recurrence 2010, - 2011 seasonal vaccines widely accessible.

Permissions are viable vaccines which storage outbreak, 2009 H1N1 2010 - 2011, expensive vaccine is widely accessible is to define. It takes from State if you need to release storage refrigerators and suppliers can guarantee vaccine cold chain integrity and vitality of the vaccine supplier. To verify that the vaccine is stored correctly before u.s. vendor temperature log vaccine providers check for vaccine to disposal.

Unused or expired vaccines, sending McKesson back.

At least the permissions should be are plans underway to store these vaccines also assign a vaccines pending seasonal. Provides that it is difficult to predict changes in the annual have enough time. Must be monitored distribution store plans to publish the manufacturers vaccine seasonal flu vaccine, CDC and the CDC's recommendation, you are no longer about how flu vaccine to (H1N1 2009 monovalent vaccine for 2010 - 11 trivalent vaccine) to minimize the administrative confusion, highly reliable supply, available information is displayed and must be brought.

.

CDC health care providers and retail trader vaccination to promote people with a high risk environment and recommends direct relationship. As part of this communication, 2009 State Health Department retailers, pharmacies, medical institutions and rest of H1N1 vaccine supply reserves vaccination demand increases and seasonal vaccine becomes available and keep requesting that CDC recommends that

You can use for storing PHER Fund on July 30, 2010, but now last 30 PHER means is no July 2010 permissions. Changes to this policy grant recipients will be notified.


View the original article here

Monday, January 17, 2011

Update: CDC evaluation 2009 H1N1 influenza cases, SR., died 2009 April-November 14, United States in

Translate Request has too much data
Parameter name: request
Translate Request has too much data
Parameter name: request
Translate Request has too much data
Parameter name: request

Estimating the number of individual flu cases in the United States is very challenging because many people with flu don’t seek medical care and only a small number of those that do seek care are tested. More people who are hospitalized or die of flu-related causes are tested and reported, but under-reporting of hospitalizations and deaths occurs as well. For this reason CDC monitors influenza activity levels and trends and virus characteristics through a nationwide surveillance system and uses statistical modeling to estimate the burden of flu illness (including hospitalizations and deaths) in the United States.

When the 2009 H1N1 flu outbreak began in April 2009, CDC began tracking and reporting the number of laboratory-confirmed 2009 H1N1 cases, hospitalizations and deaths as reported by states to CDC. These initial case counts (which were discontinued on July 24, 2009), and subsequent ongoing laboratory-confirmed reports of hospitalizations and deaths, are thought to represent a significant undercount of the actual number of 2009 H1N1 flu cases in the United States. A paper in Emerging Infectious Diseases authored by CDC staff entitled “Estimates of the Prevalence of Pandemic (H1N1) 2009, United States, April–July 2009” reported on a study to estimate the prevalence of 2009 H1N1 based on the number of laboratory-confirmed cases reported to CDC. Correcting for under-ascertainment, the study found that every case of 2009 H1N1 reported from April – July represented an estimated 79 total cases, and every hospitalized case reported may have represented an average of 2.7 total hospitalized people. CDC then began working on a way to estimate, in an ongoing way, the impact of the 2009 H1N1 pandemic on the U.S. in terms of 2009 H1N1 cases, hospitalizations and deaths. CDC developed a method to provide an estimated range of the total number of 2009 H1N1 cases, hospitalizations and deaths in the United States by age group using data on flu associated hospitalizations collected through CDC’s Emerging Infections Program.

(Print table)

On November 12, 2009 CDC provided the first set of estimates on the numbers of 2009 H1N1 cases and related hospitalizations and deaths in the United States between April and October 17, 2009.
Estimates from April – October 17, 2009:

CDC estimated that between 14 million and 34 million cases of 2009 H1N1 occurred between April and October 17, 2009. The mid-level in this range was about 22 million people infected with 2009 H1N1. CDC estimated that between about 63,000 and 153,000 2009 H1N1-related hospitalizations occurred between April and October 17, 2009. The mid-level in this range was about 98,000 H1N1-related hospitalizations. CDC estimated that between about 2,500 and 6,000 2009 H1N1-related deaths occurred between April and October 17, 2009. The mid-level in this range was about 3,900 2009 H1N1-related deaths.

Updated Estimates from April – November 14, 2009
Using the same methodology, CDC updated the estimates to include the time period from April through November 14, 2009 on December 10, 2009.

CDC estimated that between 34 million and 67 million cases of 2009 H1N1 occurred between April and November 14, 2009. The mid-level in this range was about 47 million people infected with 2009 H1N1. CDC estimated that between about 154,000 and 303,000 2009 H1N1-related hospitalizations occurred between April and November 14, 2009. The mid-level in this range was about 213,000 H1N1-related hospitalizations. CDC estimated that between about 7,070 and 13,930 2009 H1N1-related deaths occurred between April and November 14, 2009. The mid-level in this range was about 9,820 2009 H1N1-related deaths.

Updated Estimates from April – December 12, 2009
Using the same methodology, CDC updated the estimates to include the time period from April through December 12, 2009.

CDC estimates that between 39 million and 80 million cases of 2009 H1N1 occurred between April and December 12, 2009. The mid-level in this range is about 55 million people infected with 2009 H1N1. CDC estimates that between 173,000 and 362,000 2009 H1N1-related hospitalizations occurred between April and December 12, 2009. The mid-level in this range is about 246,000 H1N1-related hospitalizations. CDC estimates that between 7,880 and 16,460 2009 H1N1-related deaths occurred between April and December 12, 2009. The mid-level in this range is about 11,160 2009 H1N1-related deaths.

Updated Estimates from April 2009 – January 16, 2010
Using the same methodology, CDC updated the estimates to include the time period from April 2009 through January 16, 2010 on February 12, 2010.

CDC estimates that between 41 million and 84 million cases of 2009 H1N1 occurred between April 2009 and January 16, 2010. The mid-level in this range is about 57 million people infected with 2009 H1N1. CDC estimates that between 183,000 and 378,000 H1N1-related hospitalizations occurred between April 2009 and January 16, 2010. The mid-level in this range is about 257,000 2009 H1N1-related hospitalizations. CDC estimates that between about 8,330 and 17,160 2009 H1N1-related deaths occurred between April 2009 and January 16, 2010. The mid-level in this range is about 11,690 2009 H1N1-related deaths.

Updated Estimates from April 2009 – February 13, 2010
Using the same methodology CDC has again updated the estimates to include the time period from April 2009 through February 13, 2010 on March 12, 2010.

CDC estimates that between 42 million and 86 million cases of 2009 H1N1 occurred between April 2009 and February 13, 2010. The mid-level in this range is about 59 million people infected with 2009 H1N1. CDC estimates that between 188,000 and 389,000 H1N1-related hospitalizations occurred between April 2009 and February 13, 2010. The mid-level in this range is about 265,000 2009 H1N1-related hospitalizations. CDC estimates that between 8,520 and 17,620 2009 H1N1-related deaths occurred between April 2009 and February 13, 2010. The mid-level in this range is about 12,000 2009 H1N1-related deaths.

Updated Estimates from April 2009 – March 13, 2010
Using the same methodology CDC has again updated the estimates to include the time period from April 2009 through March 13, 2010 on April 19, 2010.

CDC estimates that between 43 million and 88 million cases of 2009 H1N1 occurred between April 2009 and March 13, 2010. The mid-level in this range is about 60 million people infected with 2009 H1N1. CDC estimates that between about 192,000 and 398,000 H1N1-related hospitalizations occurred between April 2009 and March 13, 2010. The mid-level in this range is about 270,000 2009 H1N1-related hospitalizations. CDC estimates that between about 8,720 and 18,050 2009 H1N1-related deaths occurred between April 2009 and March 13, 2010. The mid-level in this range is about 12,270 2009 H1N1-related deaths.

End of Season Estimates from April 2009 – April 10, 2010
Using the same methodology CDC again updated the estimates to include the time period from April 2009 through April 10, 2010 on May 14, 2010. Although sporadic cases of influenza are expected to occur during the summer months, no additional updated estimates using this method are planned since influenza activity is now at a low level in the United States and few hospitalizations and deaths are expected over the summer.

CDC estimates that between 43 million and 89 million cases of 2009 H1N1 occurred between April 2009 and April 10, 2010. The mid-level in this range is about 61 million people infected with 2009 H1N1. CDC estimates that between about 195,000 and 403,000 H1N1-related hospitalizations occurred between April 2009 and April 10, 2010. The mid-level in this range is about 274,000 2009 H1N1-related hospitalizations. CDC estimates that between about 8,870 and 18,300 2009 H1N1-related deaths occurred between April 2009 and April 10, 2010. The mid-level in this range is about 12,470 2009 H1N1-related deaths.

Note: Less than 5% of increases in the estimates from one reporting date to the next are the result of delayed reporting in cases, hospitalizations and deaths.

top of page

*Deaths have been rounded to the nearest ten. Hospitalizations have been rounded to the nearest thousand and cases have been rounded to the nearest million. Exact numbers also are available.

The latest estimates released on May 14, 2010, incorporate an additional four weeks of flu data (from March 14, 2010 through April 10, 2010) from the previous estimates released on April 19, 2010.

The latest estimates through April 10, 2010 again show a relatively small increase in the total number of 2009 H1N1 cases, hospitalizations and deaths since the previous estimates posted on April 19, 2010. The additional four weeks of flu activity data added to derive these updated estimates correlate with a four week period of sporadic and generally low flu activity in the United States.

The United States experienced its first wave of 2009 H1N1 pandemic activity in the spring of 2009, followed by a second wave of 2009 H1N1 activity in the fall. Activity peaked during the second week in October and then declined quickly to below baseline levels in January. The early rise in flu activity in October is in contrast to non-pandemic influenza seasons. Influenza activity usually peaks in January, February or March. (See graph of peak influenza activity by month in the United States from 1976-2009.) Because 2009 H1N1 activity peaked in late October, the greatest increase in the number of estimated 2009 H1N1 cases, hospitalizations and deaths occurred during the period of April through November 14, 2009. The estimates provided for the subsequent four weeks (through December 12, 2009) showed a modest increase in the total number of 2009 H1N1 cases, hospitalizations and deaths and correlated with decreasing but persistent flu activity nationwide. The estimates updated on February 12, 2010 with data from December 13, 2009 through January 16, 2010, correlate with a five week period of generally low flu activity. Although flu activity leveled off and was generally low in the United States from January 17 through February 13, 2010, 2009 H1N1 cases, hospitalizations and deaths continued to occur, though in much smaller increments than during fall 2009. Overall, flu activity remained generally low in the United States from February 14 – March 13, 2010; however, states in the Southeast of the country reported increases in localized flu activity during this time period.

The four weeks of flu data added to the latest and final estimates using this method encompass the time period from March 14 – April 10, 2010 (Reporting Weeks 11, 12, 13 and 14). During these four weeks, 2009 H1N1-related cases, hospitalizations and deaths continued to occur at low levels. In general, flu activity in the United States was low and followed a downward trend. Visits to doctors for influenza-like illness (ILI) were low nationally between March 14, 2010 and April 10, 2010 (Reporting weeks 11, 12, 13, and 14) and were below the national baseline during all four weeks. ILI also is looked at by region in the United States. While ILI was consistently low nationwide, during the four-week time period added to the end of season estimates, certain regions of the United States reported ILI activity above their regional baselines. During reporting week 11 (March 14– 20), Region 4 (the Southeast), Region 7 (the Midwest) and Region 9 (the Southwest) reported elevated ILI, indicating ongoing localized flu activity, almost all of it thought to be 2009 H1N1. During reporting week 12 (March 20– 27), only Region 9 (Southwest) reported elevated ILI and during weeks 13 and 14 (March 28– April 3 and April 4– April 10 respectively), no regions reported elevated ILI. No states reported widespread activity throughout this four-week period; however, three states continued to report regional flu activity during weeks 11, 12 and 13. By week 14, only two states were reporting regional activity. The proportion of deaths attributed to pneumonia and influenza (P&I) based on the 122 Cities Report remained below the epidemic threshold throughout this time period, except for during week 12, when P&I was slightly above the epidemic threshold. However, a single week elevation is not considered a true indicator of elevated activity given that P&I data for this system can fluctuate substantially from week to week. Only when P&I is elevated for two or more consecutive weeks is P&I likely to be truly elevated compared to baseline levels.

While flu is unpredictable, it is likely that sporadic cases of flu, caused by either 2009 H1N1 or seasonal flu viruses, will continue to occur throughout the remainder of the spring and through the summer in the United States. Also, it’s possible that the United States could experience early 2009 H1N1 activity next season. Internationally, 2009 H1N1 viruses are still circulating, including in the Southern Hemisphere, which is entering its flu season.

The data by age provided in the updated estimates continues to confirm that people younger than 65 years of age have been more severely affected by this disease relative to people 65 and older compared with seasonal flu. With seasonal influenza, about 60 percent of seasonal flu-related hospitalizations and 90 percent of flu-related deaths occur in people 65 years and older. With 2009 H1N1, approximately 90% of estimated hospitalizations and 87% of estimated deaths from April through April 10, 2010 occurred in people younger than 65 years old based on this method. Like seasonal flu, however, people with certain underlying health conditions were at greater risk of serious hospitalization and death associated from this virus. Of hospitalized adults and children with 2009 H1N1, 80% percent of adults and about 60% of children had underlying health conditions previously associated with conferring a greater of flu complications.

The 2009 H1N1 virus caused the first flu pandemic in more than 40 years. CDC’s estimates of cases, hospitalizations and deaths for the pandemic from April 2009–April 2010 give an overview of the burden of disease and the severity of disease by age group in the United States. While these numbers are an estimate using one specific method, CDC feels that they represents a good snapshot of the burden of 2009 H1N1 disease on the United States.

This methodology and the resulting estimates continue to underscore the substantial under-reporting that occurs when laboratory-confirmed outcomes are the sole method used to capture hospitalizations and deaths. CDC has maintained since the beginning of this outbreak that laboratory-confirmed data on hospitalizations and deaths reported to CDC is an underestimation of the true number that have occurred because of incomplete testing, use of testing methods which miss many cases, or diagnosis that attribute hospitalizations and deaths to other causes, for example, secondary complications to influenza. (Information about surveillance and reporting for 2009 H1N1 is available at Questions and Answers: Monitoring Influenza Activity, Including 2009 H1N1.)

CDC recommends influenza vaccination as the first and most important step in protecting against the flu. Flu is unpredictable, but sporadic cases of 2009 H1N1 continue to be detected in the United States and 2009 H1N1 viruses are being reported in other parts of the world. Also, it’s possible that the United States could experience early 2009 H1N1 flu activity next season, before seasonal flu vaccine is available. Therefore, CDC continues to encourage 2009 H1N1 vaccination for anyone who wants to protect themselves against 2009 H1N1. This might be especially applicable to people who are traveling to areas where 2009 H1N1 is occurring, or people who are at higher risk of flu-related complications, but have not yet gotten a 2009 H1N1 vaccine. This includes young children and people 65 years and older. In addition, certain health conditions increase the risk of being hospitalized from 2009 H1N1, including lung disease, like asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), diabetes, heart, or neurologic disease, and pregnancy. In addition, minority populations have been harder-hit by the 2009 H1N1 pandemic than non-minority groups (See “Information on 2009 H1N1 impact by Race and Ethnicity.)” There also is growing evidence to support early concerns that people who are morbidly obese are at greater risk of serious 2009 H1N1 complications.

top of page

(Print graphics)

The graphs below illustrate CDC’s estimates of cumulative 2009 H1N1 cases, hospitalizations and deaths in the United States by age group from April 2009 – April 10, 2010. The vertical black lines represent the range in 2009 H1N1 estimates for each time period. To see the tables associated with the earlier time periods for which CDC provided estimates, please see the April 2009 – March 13, 2010, the April 2009 – February 13, 2010, the April 2009 – January 16, 2010, the April – December 12, 2009 estimates, the April – November 14, 2009 estimates, and the April – October 17, 2009 estimates.

Graph A below provides a summary illustration of the various estimates for 2009 H1N1 cases, made over time.

CDC estimates of cumulative 2009-chart A

Graph A shows the cumulative estimated 2009 H1N1 cases by age group (0-17 years old, 18-64 years old, and 65 years and older) in the United States for each of the time periods that CDC provided case estimates and illustrates that people in the 18-64 years age group were most heavily impacted by 2009 H1N1 disease followed by people in the 0-17 years age group. People 65 years of age and older were relatively less affected by 2009 H1N1 illness.

top of page

Graph B below shows the total cumulative 2009 H1N1 cases (across all age groups) reported for each of the time periods that CDC provided case estimates.

Graph B

The curved black line in Graph B depicts the increase in 2009 H1N1 cases per the midpoint value of the estimates for each reporting period for which CDC provided 2009 H1N1 case estimates. The curved line in Graph B shows that the greatest increase in 2009 H1N1 cases occurred between October 17, 2009 and November 14, 2009, which correlates with the peak of the fall-winter wave of 2009 H1N1 activity in the United States.

Graphs C and D below display estimates of 2009 H1N1 related hospitalizations in the United States.

graph C

Graph C shows cumulative estimated 2009 H1N1 hospitalizations by age group (0-17 years old, 18-64 years old, and 65 years and older) in the United States for each of the time periods that CDC provided estimates of hospitalizations, and illustrates, again, that people 18-64 years of age were most impacted by serious illness (including hospitalizations), followed by people in the 0-17 years old age group. Again, people 65 and older were relatively less affected by 2009 H1N1 hospitalizations than people in other age groups.

graph D

Graph D shows the total cumulative 2009 H1N1 hospitalizations reported for each of the time periods that CDC provided estimates of hospitalizations. The curved line in Graph D depicts the increase in 2009 H1N1 hospitalizations per the midpoint value of the estimates of each time period for which CDC provided estimates of hospitalizations. The curved line in Graph D shows that the greatest increase in 2009 H1N1 hospitalizations occurred between October 17, 2009 and November 14, 2009.

Graphs E and F below display estimates related to 2009 H1N1 deaths in the United States.

graph E

Graph E shows the cumulative estimated 2009 H1N1 deaths by age group (0-17 years old, 18-64 years old, and 65 years and older) in the United States for each of the time periods that CDC provided estimates of deaths and illustrates, again, that people in the 18-64 years age group were relatively more affected by 2009 H1N1 related deaths than people in other age groups.

graph F

Graph F shows the total cumulative 2009 H1N1 deaths reported for each of the time periods that CDC provided estimates of deaths. The curved line in Graph F depicts the increase in 2009 H1N1 deaths per the mid-point value of the estimations for each reporting period for which CDC provided estimates of deaths. The curved line in Graph F shows that the greatest increase in 2009 H1N1 deaths occurred between October 17, 2009 and November 14, 2009.

CDC has developed a method to provide an estimated range of the total number of 2009 H1N1 cases, hospitalizations and deaths in the United States since April 2009, as well as a breakdown of these estimates by age groups. This method uses data on influenza-associated hospitalizations collected through CDC’s Emerging Infections Program (EIP), which conducts surveillance for laboratory-confirmed influenza-related hospitalizations in children and adults in 62 counties covering 13 metropolitan areas of 10 states. To determine an estimated number of 2009 H1N1 hospitalizations nationwide, the EIP hospitalization data are extrapolated to the entire U.S. population and then corrected for factors that may result in under-reporting using a multiplier from “Estimates of the Prevalence of Pandemic (H1N1) 2009, United States, April–July 2009.”  The lower and upper hospitalization estimates also are calculated using the EIP hospitalization data. The national hospitalization estimates are then used to calculate deaths and cases. Deaths are calculated by using the proportion of laboratory-confirmed deaths to hospitalizations reported through CDC’s web-based Aggregate Hospitalization and Death Reporting Activity (AHDRA). Cases are estimated using multipliers derived from “Estimates of the Prevalence of Pandemic (H1N1) 2009, United States, April–July 2009.”  The lower and upper end of the ranges for deaths and cases are derived from the lower and upper hospitalization estimates. The methods used to estimate impact may be modified as more information becomes available. More information about this methodology is available.

The estimated ranges of cases, hospitalizations and deaths generated by this method provide a sense of scale in terms of the burden of disease caused by 2009 H1N1. It may never be possible to validate the accuracy of these figures. The true number of cases, hospitalizations and deaths may lie within the range provided or it’s also possible that it may lie outside the range. The underlying assumption in this method is that the level of influenza activity (based on hospitalization rates) in EIP sites matches the level of influenza like illness (ILI) activity across the states.

This methodology is not a predictive tool and cannot be used to forecast the number of cases, hospitalizations and deaths that will occur going forward over the course of the pandemic because they are based on actual surveillance data.

top of page

The Emerging Infections Program (EIP) Influenza Project conducts surveillance for laboratory-confirmed influenza-related hospitalizations in children and adults in 62 counties covering 13 metropolitan areas of 10 states. (This includes San Francisco, CA; Denver, CO; New Haven, CT; Atlanta, GA; Baltimore, MD; Minneapolis/St. Paul, MN; Albuquerque, NM; Santa Fe, NM, Las Cruces, NM; Albany, NY; Rochester, NY; Portland, OR; and Nashville, TN.) Cases are identified by reviewing hospital laboratory and admission databases and infection control logs for children and adults with a documented positive influenza test conducted as a part of routine patient care. EIP estimated hospitalization rates are reported every week during the flu season. More information about the Emerging Infections Program is available.

An average estimated 200,000 flu-related hospitalizations occur in the United States each year, with about 60 percent of these hospitalizations occurring in people 65 years and older.

Background: A study conducted by CDC and published in the Journal of American Medical Association (JAMA) in September 2004 provided information on the number of people in the United States that are hospitalized from seasonal influenza-related complications each year. The study concluded that, on average, more than 200,000 people in the United States are hospitalized each year for respiratory and heart conditions illnesses associated with seasonal influenza virus infections. The study looked at hospital records from 1979 to 2001. In 1979, there were 120,929 flu-related hospitalizations. The number was lower in some years after that, but there was an overall upward trend. During the 1990s, the average number of people hospitalized was more than 200,000 but individual seasons ranged from a low of 157,911 in 1990-91 to a high of 430,960 in 1997-98.

More information about seasonal flu-related hospitalizations is available.

Flu-associated mortality varies by season because flu seasons often fluctuate in length and severity. CDC estimates that about 36,000 people died of flu-related causes each year, on average, during the 1990s in the United States with 90 percent of these deaths occurring in people 65 years and older. This includes people dying from secondary complications of the flu.

Background: This estimate came from a 2003 Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) study, which looked at the 1990-91 through the 1998-99 flu seasons and is based on the number of people whose underlying cause of death on their death certificate was listed as a respiratory or circulatory disease. During these years, the number of estimated deaths ranged from 17,000 to 52,000. This number was corroborated in 2009, when a CDC-authored study was published in the journal Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses. This study estimated seasonal flu-related deaths comparing different methods, including the methods used in the 2003 JAMA study but using more recent data. Results from this study showed that during this time period, 36,171 flu-related deaths occurred per year, on average.

More information about how CDC estimates seasonal flu-related deaths is available.

CDC does not know exactly how many people die from seasonal flu each year. There are several reasons for this:

First, states are not required to report individual seasonal flu cases or deaths of people older than 18 years of age to CDC. Second, seasonal influenza is infrequently listed on death certificates of people who die from flu-related complications. Third, many seasonal flu-related deaths occur one or two weeks after a person’s initial infection, either because the person may develop a secondary bacterial co-infection (such as a staph infection) or because seasonal influenza can aggravate an existing chronic illness (such as congestive heart failure or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease). Also, most people who die from seasonal flu-related complications are not tested for flu, or they seek medical care later in their illness when seasonal influenza can no longer be detected from respiratory samples. Influenza tests are most likely to detect influenza if performed soon after onset of illness. In addition, some patients may be tested for influenza using rapid tests that are only moderately sensitive and result in some false-negative results. For these reasons, many flu-related deaths may not be recorded on death certificates. These are some of the reasons that CDC and other public health agencies in the United States and other countries use statistical models to estimate the annual number of seasonal flu-related deaths. (Flu deaths in children were made a nationally notifiable condition in 2004, and since then, states have reported flu-related child deaths in the United States through the Influenza Associated Pediatric Mortality Surveillance System).

View the original article here

Sunday, January 16, 2011

Update: 2009 H1N1 influenza international situation update.

This report uses August 6 to data collected through August 1, 2010, and the World Health Organization (WHO) influenza International provides updates.

If the WHO Laboratory confirmation the influenza H1N1 2009 death and status update report continues the Web page. How many death flu test actual number of these deaths and under-representation in recognized and no associated with influenza.

In General, H1N1 flu, seasonal flu is lower by 2009.

Influenza activity in the northern hemisphere, past month over slow or sporadic was.

Depends on the location of the most active areas in the southern hemisphere influenza activity level, fashionable South Asia and the tropical Americas limited field. Generally seasonal and pandemic influenza activity in the temperate low levels in the southern hemisphere South Africa. Distribution of East Africa, Southeast Asia seasonal influenza viruses, particularly influenza (H3N2) is displayed and continue.

Over Australia, New Zealand increase in influenza activity (or) rates in the last 6-8 weeks, reported last week. However, smaller yet seen in 2009. 2009 Is the influenza H1N1 influenza B viruses and low co-circulation influenza (H3N2) reported on the most frequently.

Chile as Argentina, overall reported influenza activity is low. 2009 H1N1 flu virus most often reported by Chile low co-circulation influenza B as (H3N2).

Central America still report of seasonal influenza viruses, particularly influenza (H3N2) circular.

In Asia, most active areas of influenza India, parts in 2009 H1N1 mainly occurs. Is the absence of any?, however overall breaking the observed in the first wave, showing strength and seriousness:. Activity levels-low the 2009 H1N1 South East Asia, Nepal, Bhutan country also.

showed that the virological data from major seasonal influenza B viruses (H3N2) peak is reached South Africa influenza activity early July. Sustainable transport 2009 H1N1 Ghana in June and July reports during the year 2010. Suggested evidence seasonal flu (H3N2) and b viruses continue and spread throughout the Eastern and Central Africa. Reported low incidence (H3N2) recently reported by Kenya, Cameroon flu influenza b level rocks.


View the original article here

Saturday, January 15, 2011

Update: 2009 H1N1 influenza international situation update.

This report uses August 6 to data collected through August 1, 2010, and the World Health Organization (WHO) influenza International provides updates.

If the WHO Laboratory confirmation the influenza H1N1 2009 death and status update report continues the Web page. How many death flu test actual number of these deaths and under-representation in recognized and no associated with influenza.

In General, H1N1 flu, seasonal flu is lower by 2009.

Influenza activity in the northern hemisphere, past month over slow or sporadic was.

Depends on the location of the most active areas in the southern hemisphere influenza activity level, fashionable South Asia and the tropical Americas limited field. Generally seasonal and pandemic influenza activity in the temperate low levels in the southern hemisphere South Africa. Distribution of East Africa, Southeast Asia seasonal influenza viruses, particularly influenza (H3N2) is displayed and continue.

Over Australia, New Zealand increase in influenza activity (or) rates in the last 6-8 weeks, reported last week. However, smaller yet seen in 2009. 2009 Is the influenza H1N1 influenza B viruses and low co-circulation influenza (H3N2) reported on the most frequently.

Chile as Argentina, overall reported influenza activity is low. 2009 H1N1 flu virus most often reported by Chile low co-circulation influenza B as (H3N2).

Central America still report of seasonal influenza viruses, particularly influenza (H3N2) circular.

In Asia, most active areas of influenza India, parts in 2009 H1N1 mainly occurs. Is the absence of any?, however overall breaking the observed in the first wave, showing strength and seriousness:. Activity levels-low the 2009 H1N1 South East Asia, Nepal, Bhutan country also.

showed that the virological data from major seasonal influenza B viruses (H3N2) peak is reached South Africa influenza activity early July. Sustainable transport 2009 H1N1 Ghana in June and July reports during the year 2010. Suggested evidence seasonal flu (H3N2) and b viruses continue and spread throughout the Eastern and Central Africa. Reported low incidence (H3N2) recently reported by Kenya, Cameroon flu influenza b level rocks.


View the original article here

Friday, January 14, 2011

New: influenza other person's symptoms treatment

This site is archived for historical purposes and is no longer supported or updated. Flu season 2010 - 2011, update, see the CDC seasonal flu.

December 5, 2009, 6: 00 pm ET

Acetaminophen or ibuprofen painIce chip or ice pop fixed-numbing throat and get sick woman drinking tea mixes the liquid body with warm water and salt 1 teaspoon 1 Cup. Rinse and then dump. chillsAcetaminophen light blanket or ibuprofen for pain and suffering. Make sure to read the right amount of text.

Mucus cause body than the flu. You can get stuffy nose, sinus, ear, and chest. This overload can cause pain.

For more hotel manager of acetaminophen or ibuprofen (type of talk, pharmacist give children's cough and cold medicine 4 years you must purchase. )? Humidifier. Small droplets of moisture (water), in the air on this machine. This excess moisture to patients breathe easier. Warm zud âs ego facial pain relief sinus

Influenza infection by the stomach ache. They also give up or will lose their flights (diarrhea). You must call the doctor with a severe stomach ache.

Treat loose stool adults easily help ordinary product cleaning fluid stomach drinkMedicines

View the original article here

Thursday, January 13, 2011

MMWR update: influenza activity---United States, 30 August 2009 - 27 March 2010 and composition of influenza vaccine 2010 - 11

Translate Request has too much data
Parameter name: request
Translate Request has too much data
Parameter name: request
Translate Request has too much data
Parameter name: request

The emergence and spread of 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1) virus resulted in substantial influenza activity in the United States throughout the summer and fall months of 2009, with activity peaking in late October. Activity declined beginning in November 2009 (1) but continued at lower levels through March 2010. The 2009 H1N1 virus remained the dominant circulating influenza virus throughout the season; <1% of characterized viruses were seasonal influenza A (H1), A (H3), and influenza B viruses. This report summarizes U.S. influenza activity* from August 30, 2009, the start of the 2009--10 influenza season, through March 27, 2010, and also reports on the 2010--11 Northern Hemisphere influenza vaccine strain selection.

Viral Surveillance

From August 30, 2009, through March 27, 2010, World Health Organization (WHO) and National Respiratory and Enteric Virus Surveillance System (NREVSS) collaborating laboratories in the United States tested 422,648 specimens. Of these, 89,585 (21.1%) were positive: 89,298 (99.7%) were positive for influenza A, and 287 (0.3%) were positive for influenza B. Among 66,978 influenza A viruses for which subtyping was performed, almost all (66,589 [99.4%]) were 2009 H1N1 viruses.

Of the 37,260 specimens reported during February 14--March 27, 2010, a total of 2,020 (5.4%) tested positive for influenza, of which 1,999 (98.9%) were positive for influenza A and 21 (1.0%) were positive for influenza B. Of the 1,510 influenza A viruses reported since mid-February for which subtyping was performed, almost all (1,506 [99.7%]) were 2009 H1N1 viruses. No seasonal influenza A (H1) viruses and only three influenza A (H3) viruses were reported. During February 14--March 27, states in the Southeast (Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Tennessee) accounted for approximately 55% of the influenza positives reported but only 20% of the specimens tested.

Antigenic Characterization

States are requested to submit a subset of their influenza virus isolates to CDC for antigenic characterization. From August 30, 2009, through March 27, 2010, CDC antigenically characterized 1,647 influenza viruses submitted by WHO collaborating laboratories in the United States. These consisted of two seasonal influenza A (H1N1) viruses, 13 influenza A (H3N2), 23 influenza B, and 1,609 2009 influenza A (H1N1) viruses. Both seasonal influenza A (H1N1) viruses tested were related to the influenza A (H1N1) component of the 2009--10 Northern Hemisphere influenza vaccine (A/Brisbane/59/2007). The 13 influenza A (H3N2) viruses tested showed reduced titers with antisera produced against A/Brisbane/10/2007, the 2009--10 Northern Hemisphere influenza A (H3N2) vaccine component, and were antigenically related to A/Perth/16/2009, the WHO-recommended influenza A (H3N2) component of the 2010 Southern Hemisphere and 2010--11 Northern Hemisphere vaccine formulations.

Globally circulating influenza B viruses can be divided into two distinct lineages represented by the B/Yamagata/16/88 and B/Victoria/02/87 viruses. The influenza B component of the 2009--10 and 2010--11 Northern Hemisphere vaccines belongs to the B/Victoria lineage. The 23 influenza B viruses characterized to date this season belong to the B/Victoria lineage and are related to the influenza vaccine component for the 2009--10 and 2010--11 Northern Hemisphere influenza B vaccine strain (B/Brisbane/60/2008). Of the 1,609 2009 H1N1 viruses tested, nearly all (1,604 [99.7%]) were related to the A/California/07/2009 (H1N1) reference virus selected by WHO as the 2009 H1N1 virus vaccine component for the 2010--11 Northern Hemisphere vaccine. Five viruses (0.3%) tested showed reduced titers with antiserum produced against A/California/07/2009; these were collected in September (two), October (one), November (one), and December (one) 2009.

Antiviral Resistance of Influenza Virus Isolates

CDC conducts surveillance for resistance of circulating influenza viruses to both classes of influenza antiviral medications: adamantanes (amantadine and rimantadine) and neuraminidase inhibitors (zanamivir and oseltamivir). A total of 64 oseltamivir-resistant 2009 H1N1 viruses have been identified in the United States since April 2009, with 55 identified from specimens collected after August 30, 2009. This number of oseltamivir-resistant 2009 H1N1 viruses might overestimate the prevalence of oseltamivir-resistant 2009 H1N1 viruses in the United States because most cases were selected for testing because of clinical suspicion for oseltamivir resistance. In 52 (81.3%) of the 64 identified cases of oseltamivir resistance, patients had documented exposure to oseltamivir through either treatment or chemoprophylaxis; eight patients have yet to have their exposure to oseltamivir determined, three patients had no known exposure, and oseltamivir exposure for one patient could not be determined. One seasonal influenza A (H1N1) virus was tested and found to be resistant to oseltamivir, whereas none of the 12 influenza A (H3N2) or 11 influenza B viruses tested was resistant to oseltamivir. All tested viruses were sensitive to the neuraminidase inhibitor zanamivir. The single seasonal influenza A (H1N1) virus tested was collected on September 8, 2009, and found to have sensitivity to the adamantanes. However, all 12 influenza A (H3N2) virus isolates and 1,491 (99.7%) of 1,495 2009 H1N1 virus isolates tested were found to have resistance to the adamantanes.

Outpatient Illness Surveillance

The weekly percentage of outpatient visits for influenza-like-illness (ILI)† reported by the U.S. Outpatient ILI Surveillance Network (ILINet) exceeded baseline levels§ (2.3%) for 18 weeks during the 2009--10 season and peaked at 7.7% in the week ending October 24, 2009. Since that time, ILI has declined and was at 1.6% in the week ending March 27, 2010 (Figure 1). On a regional level, the percentage of outpatient visits for ILI ranged from 0.4% to 3.3% during the week ending March 27, 2010. One of the 10 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) regions (Region 9, comprised of Arizona, California, Hawaii, Nevada, American Samoa, Guam, Los Angeles County, the Commonwealth of Northern Mariana Islands, the Federal States of Micronesia, the Republic of Marshall Islands, and Palau) reported ILI at or above its region-specific baseline during that week.

Influenza-Associated Hospitalizations

Laboratory-confirmed influenza-associated hospitalizations are monitored using a population-based surveillance network that includes the 13 Emerging Infections Program (EIP) sites in 10 states and six new sites added during 2009.¶ This season's cumulative hospitalization rates from August 30, 2009, through the week ending March 27, 2010, remain highest in children aged 0--4 years and generally decline with increasing age. Cumulative rates of laboratory-confirmed, influenza-associated hospitalizations reported for children aged 0--4 years were 6.6 per 10,000 population in EIP sites and 10.5 per 10,000 population in the new sites (Figure 2). Rates for other age groups were as follows: 5--17 years, 2.5 in EIP and 3.6 in the new sites; 18--49 years, 2.4 in EIP and 1.7 in the new sites; 50--64 years, 3.2 in EIP and 2.0 in the new sites; and =65 years, 2.7 in EIP and 1.8 in the new sites.

In response to the emergence and widespread circulation of the 2009 H1N1 virus, the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists (CSTE) implemented reporting of influenza-associated hospitalizations and deaths to CDC. On August 30, CDC and CSTE instituted modified case definitions for aggregate reporting of influenza-associated hospitalizations and deaths. This cumulative jurisdiction-level reporting is referred to as the Aggregate Hospitalization and Death Reporting Activity (AHDRA).** During August 30, 2009--March 27, 2010, a median of 34 states each week reported a total of 41,689 hospitalizations associated with laboratory-confirmed influenza virus infections to CDC through AHDRA. Rates of hospitalization through AHDRA were highest among children aged 0--4 years (71.5 per 100,000) and ranged from 23.2 to 30.00 per 100,000 for older children and adults. Overall, weekly reported rates have declined consistently since January 2, 2010.

Pneumonia- and Influenza-Related Mortality

Pneumonia- and influenza-associated deaths are monitored by the 122 Cities Mortality Reporting System and AHDRA. For the week ending March 27, 2010, pneumonia or influenza was reported as an underlying or contributing cause of death for 7.9% of all deaths reported through the 122 Cities Mortality Reporting System, slightly above the week-specific epidemic threshold of 7.8%†† but below the threshold for the preceding 7 weeks (Figure 3). Pneumonia- and influenza-related mortality was above the epidemic threshold for 13 consecutive weeks from the week ending October 3, 2009, through the week ending December 12, 2009, was below threshold for 2 weeks, and above the threshold again during January 10--30, 2010 (epidemiologic weeks 2--4).

During August 30, 2009--March 27, 2010, a total of 2,096 deaths associated with laboratory-confirmed influenza virus infections were reported to CDC through AHDRA. The median number of states reporting laboratory-confirmed deaths each week to AHDRA was 36. Cumulative influenza-associated death rates since August 30, 2009, were highest among persons aged 50--64 years (1.56 per 100,000) and lowest in children (0.43 per 100,000 for children aged 0--4 years and 0.36 for children aged 5--18 years). Among persons aged 19--24 years, 25--49 years, and =65 years, cumulative influenza-associated mortality rates per 100,000 persons were 0.54, 0.87, and 0.95, respectively. Weekly reported death rates have declined steadily since November 2009 and are at their lowest level since the implementation of AHDRA in August 2009.

Influenza-Associated Pediatric Mortality

CDC has received 269 reports of pediatric deaths associated with laboratory-confirmed influenza infection that occurred since August 30, 2009, the start of the 2009--10 influenza season (Figure 4). A total of 219 (81%) cases were associated with infection with laboratory-confirmed 2009 H1N1 virus, and 49 (18%) were associated with an influenza A infection for which the subtype was undetermined. These deaths occurred during times when approximately 99% of subtyped influenza A viruses were 2009 H1N1 and were therefore likely to be associated with 2009 H1N1 because of the predominance of this virus. One death was associated with an influenza B virus infection.

Of the 269 reported pediatric deaths that occurred since August 30, 2009, a total of 48 (18%) were among children aged <2 years, 30 (11%) were among children aged 2--4 years, 100 (37%) were among children aged 5--11 years, and 91 (34%) were among children aged 12--17 years. A medical history was reported for 263 of the 269 decedents (98%). Of these 263 decedents, 182 (69%) had one or more medical conditions associated with an increased risk for influenza-related complications (2).

Since the week ending April 26, 2009, CDC has received 280 reports of pediatric deaths associated with laboratory-confirmed 2009 H1N1 virus. CDC also has received reports of 51 deaths with laboratory-confirmed influenza A for which subtype information was not available.

State-Specific Activity Levels

The largest number of states to date reporting widespread activity occurred during the week ending October 24, 2009, when 49 jurisdictions reported widespread activity.§§ During the week ending March 27, 2010, no states reported widespread influenza activity; three states reported regional influenza activity (Alabama, Georgia, and South Carolina); Puerto Rico and seven states (Arkansas, Hawaii, Louisiana, Maine, North Carolina, Tennessee, and Virginia) reported local influenza activity; the District of Columbia, Guam, and 30 states reported sporadic influenza activity; and 10 states reported no influenza activity. During the 2009--10 season, regional or widespread influenza activity has been reported during at least 1 week from all 50 states.

Although most states have experienced steady declines in influenza activity since November 2009, sustained activity has been observed in some parts of the United States. In HHS Region 4 (consisting of Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Tennessee), the proportion of ILINet provider visits for ILI was at or above the regional baseline level (2%) for 12 of the 17 preceding weeks. From early December 2009 through the week ending March 27, 2010, while influenza activity in most of the rest of the country declined to sporadic or none, several southeastern states continued to report local or regional activity. Beginning February 2010, the number of influenza-associated hospitalizations increased in Alabama, Georgia, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, and South Carolina, compared with the immediately preceding weeks. Georgia, in particular, had a moderate but steady increase in the number of hospitalizations reported to AHDRA from mid-February through March 27. During the week ending March 27, Georgia reported 16 hospitalizations, a decrease from a median of 38 per week during the preceding 5 weeks.

Composition of the 2010--11 Influenza Vaccine

WHO has recommended vaccine strains for the 2010--11 Northern Hemisphere trivalent influenza vaccine, and the Food and Drug Administration has made the same recommendations for influenza vaccine composition for the United States. Both agencies recommend that vaccines contain A/California/7/2009-like (2009 H1N1), A/Perth/16/2009-like (H3N2), and B/Brisbane/60/2008-like (B/Victoria lineage) viruses. A seasonal influenza A (H1N1) component is not included in the 2010--11 formulation, and the A (H3N2) component has been changed from A/Brisbane/59/2007 in the 2009--10 Northern Hemisphere vaccine formulation. This recommendation was based on surveillance data related to epidemiology and antigenic characteristics, serologic responses to 2009--10 trivalent seasonal and 2009 H1N1 monovalent vaccines, and the availability of candidate strains and reagents (3).

WHO Collaborating Center for Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Control of Influenza. M Jhung, MD, L Brammer, MPH, S Epperson, MPH, L Blanton, MPH, R Dhara, MPH, T Wallis, MS, A Fiore, MD, L Gubareva, PhD, J Bresee, MD, L Kamimoto, MD, X Xu, MD, A Klimov, PhD, N Cox, PhD, L Finelli, DrPH, Influenza Div, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases; R Njai, PhD, EIS Officer, CDC.

With the emergence of the 2009 H1N1 virus in April 2009, influenza activity increased and remained at higher than normal levels during the spring and summer until peaking in late October and early November 2009. Since that time, influenza activity has declined nationwide and currently is below epidemic thresholds or baseline levels across most influenza surveillance systems. In contrast to seasonal influenza, which usually peaks once during the first few months of the calendar year, the overall course of the 2009 H1N1 pandemic occurred in two distinct waves, a spring 2009 wave peaking in June and a second, larger, fall 2009 wave, peaking in late October. Similar two-wave patterns were observed in the 1918--19 H1N1 and the 1957--58 H2N2 pandemics in the United States (4). The magnitude and timing of ILI activity during the current season also were substantially different from those observed in previous years. ILI activity for the 2009--10 H1N1 influenza season peaked in late October at 7.7%, whereas activity typically peaks in February and in previous seasons has been much lower (3.5% in the 2008--09 season, 6% in the 2007--08 season, 3.6% in the 2006--07 season, and 3.3% in the 2005--06 season).

The magnitude and age distribution of influenza-associated hospitalizations during the 2009--10 H1N1 season were different compared with previous seasons. Hospitalization rates reported to EIP sites during the current season were much higher than previous seasons across most age groups. In 2008--09, when seasonal H1N1 was the predominant strain, hospitalizations occurred at approximately one sixth the 2009--10 rate for persons aged 18--49 years and one half the 2009--10 rate for those aged 0--4 years and =65 years. Similarly, in 2007--08, when H3N2 virus was predominant, hospitalizations occurred at approximately one quarter the 2009--10 rate for persons aged 5--17 years and one half the 2009--10 rate for those aged 0--4 years; however, the hospitalization rate for persons aged =65 years in 2007--08 was 2.6 times that of the rate reported for the current season. Moreover, although during typical influenza seasons the majority of influenza-associated hospitalizations occur among adults aged =65 years (5,6), hospitalizations among younger persons accounted for the majority of hospitalizations during the 2009 H1N1 pandemic (7). The relatively higher burden of disease borne by younger age groups might be due, in part, to previous exposure of older persons to viruses antigenically similar to 2009 H1N1 virus (8).

By March 27, 2010, national influenza activity had decreased to the lowest level measured during the 2009--10 season; however, isolated areas experienced sustained transmission during recent winter months. Notably, states in the southeastern United States (Alabama, Georgia, Mississippi, and South Carolina) continued to report elevated rates of influenza activity, influenza-associated hospitalizations, and increased prevalence of ILI compared with baseline. Although continued focal transmission of 2009 H1N1 influenza during the winter months is not unexpected, trends in the southeast region and particularly Georgia highlight the need to maintain public health surveillance and continue to offer 2009 H1N1 vaccine. The basis for sustained activity in the southeast is unclear but might be related, in part, to lower community attack rates in the spring and summer and lower vaccination rates, leading to an overall more susceptible population in the region (9).

Vaccination with 2009 H1N1 vaccine remains the key strategy for prevention of 2009 H1N1 influenza infection (2). Although national influenza activity has decreased substantially since peak activity in October 2009, the persistence of sustained transmission in some areas (resulting in additional cases, hospitalizations, and deaths) emphasizes the importance of a continued focus on vaccination of initial target groups as well as the rest of the susceptible population.

Changes in the geographic spread, type, subtype, and severity of the circulating influenza viruses will continue to be monitored and reported weekly in the online national influenza surveillance summary, FluView.¶¶ Additional information regarding prevention and treatment of the 2009 H1N1 influenza infection also is available online.***

This report is based, in part, on contributions by participating state and territorial health departments and state public health laboratories, World Health Organization collaborating laboratories, National Respiratory and Enteric Virus Surveillance System collaborating laboratories, the U.S. Outpatient ILI Surveillance Network, the Emerging Infections Program, the Aggregate Hospitalization and Death Reporting Activity, the Influenza Associated Pediatric Mortality Surveillance System, and the 122 Cities Mortality Reporting System.

CDC. Update: influenza activity---United States, August 30, 2009--January 2, 2010. MMWR 2010;59:38--43.CDC. Use of influenza A (H1N1) 2009 monovalent vaccine: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), 2009. MMWR 2009;58(No. RR-10).World Health Organization. Recommended viruses for influenza vaccines for use in the 2010--2011 northern hemisphere influenza season. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2010. Available at http://www.who.int/csr/disease/influenza/recommendations2010_11north/en/index.html. Accessed April 12, 2010.Kilbourne ED. Influenza pandemics of the 20th century. Emerg Infect Dis 2006;12:9--14.Thompson WW, Shay DK, Weintraub E, et al. Influenza-associated hospitalizations in the United States. JAMA 2004;292:1333--40.Thompson WW, Shay DK, Weintraub E, et al. Mortality associated with influenza and respiratory syncytial virus in the United States. JAMA 2003;289:179--86.Jain S, Kamimoto L, Bramley AM, et al. Hospitalized patients with 2009 H1N1 influenza in the United States, April--June 2009. N Engl J Med 2009;361:1935--44.Hancock K, Veguilla V, Lu X, et al. Cross-reactive antibody responses to the 2009 pandemic H1N1 influenza virus. N Engl J Med 2009;361:1945--52.CDC. Interim Results: state-specific influenza A (H1N1) 2009 monovalent vaccination coverage----United States, October 2009--January 2010. MMWR 2010;59:363--8.
What is already known on this topic?

The 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1) virus emerged in April 2009 and caused substantial disease in the United States and worldwide.

What is added by this report?

Although recent declines in influenza activity have been observed, 2009 H1N1 viruses continue to circulate, particularly in the southeastern United States, and influenza-associated hospitalizations and deaths continue to be reported.

What are the implications for public health practice?

Epidemiologic data in this report support recommendations by CDC that the 2009 H1N1 vaccine continue to be offered to all persons aged =6 months, with children aged <10 years requiring 2 doses of the vaccine approximately 1 month apart.


FIGURE 1. Percentage of visits for influenza-like illness (ILI) reported by the U.S. Outpatient Influenza-Like Illness Surveillance Network (ILINet), by surveillance week --- United States, 2006--07, 2007--08, 2008--09, and 2009--10* influenza seasons

The figure shows the percentage of visits for influenza-like illness (ILI) reported by the U.S. Outpatient Influenza-like Illness Surveillance Network (ILINet), by surveillance week in the United States for the 2006-07, 2007-08, 2008-09, and 2009-10 influenza seasons. In the week ending October 24, 2009, the weekly percentage of outpatient visits for ILI reported by the U.S. Outpatient ILINet reached 7.7%, the highest level to date this influenza season and a level higher than the three preceding seasons. After peaking, the ILI level decreased to 1.6% in the week ending March 27, 2010.

Alternate Text: The figure above shows the percentage of visits for influenza-like illness (ILI) reported by the U.S. Outpatient Influenza-like Illness Surveillance Network (ILINet), by surveillance week in the United States for the 2006-07, 2007-08, 2008-09, and 2009-10 influenza seasons. In the week ending October 24, 2009, the weekly percentage of outpatient visits for ILI reported by the U.S. Outpatient ILINet reached 7.7%, the highest level to date this influenza season and a level higher than the three preceding seasons. After peaking, the ILI level decreased to 1.6% in the week ending March 27, 2010.


FIGURE 2. Number of laboratory-confirmed influenza-associated hospitalizations and cumulative hospitalization rates per 10,000 population, by age group and surveillance week --- Emerging Infections Program (EIP) and new sites,* 2006--07, 2007--08, 2008--09,† and 2009--10§ U.S. influenza seasons

The figure shows the number of 2009-10 laboratory-confirmed influenza-associated hospitalizations and cumulative hospitalization rates per 10,000 population, by age group and surveillance week from Emerging Infections Program (EIP), and new sites for the 2006-07, 2007-08, 2008-09, and 2009-10 influenza seasons. As of March 27, 2010, cumulative rates of laboratory-confirmed influenza-associated hospitalizations reported for children aged 0-4 years were 6.6 per 10,000 population by EIP and 10.5 per 10,000 population by the new sites.

Alternate Text: The figure above shows the number of 2009-10 laboratory-confirmed influenza-associated hospitalizations and cumulative hospitalization rates per 10,000 population, by age group and surveillance week from Emerging Infections Program (EIP), and new sites for the 2006-07, 2007-08, 2008-09, and 2009-10 influenza seasons. As of March 27, 2010, cumulative rates of laboratory-confirmed influenza-associated hospitalizations reported for children aged 0-4 years were 6.6 per 10,000 population by EIP and 10.5 per 10,000 population by the new sites.

FIGURE 3. Percentage of all deaths attributed to pneumonia and influenza (P&I), by surveillance week and year --- 122 Cities Mortality Reporting Sytem, United States, 2005--2010

The figure shows the percentage of all deaths attributed to pneumonia and influenza (P&I), by surveillance week and year for 122 U.S. cities from 2006-2010 from the Mortality Reporting System. For the week ending March 27, pneumonia or influenza was reported as an underlying or contributing cause of death for 7.9% of all deaths reported through the 122 Cities Mortality Reporting System, above the week-specific epidemic threshold of 7.8%.

Alternate Text: The figure above shows the percentage of all deaths attributed to pneumonia and influenza (P&I), by surveillance week and year for 122 U.S. cities from 2006-2010 from the Mortality Reporting System. For the week ending March 27, pneumonia or influenza was reported as an underlying or contributing cause of death for 7.9% of all deaths reported through the 122 Cities Mortality Reporting System, above the week-specific epidemic threshold of 7.8%.

FIGURE 4. Number of influenza-associated pediatric deaths, by week of death --- United States, 2006--07, 2007--08, 2008--09, and 2009--10* influenza seasons

The figure shows the number of influenza-associated pediatric deaths, by week of death in the United States for the 2006-07, 2007-08, 2008-09, and 2009-10 influenza seasons. CDC has received 269 reports of pediatric deaths associated with laboratory-confirmed influenza infection that occurred and were reporting since August 30, 2009.

Alternate Text: The figure above shows the number of influenza-associated pediatric deaths, by week of death in the United States for the 2006-07, 2007-08, 2008-09, and 2009-10 influenza seasons. CDC has received 269 reports of pediatric deaths associated with laboratory-confirmed influenza infection that occurred and were reporting since August 30, 2009.


Use of trade names and commercial sources is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

References to non-CDC sites on the Internet are provided as a service to MMWR readers and do not constitute or imply endorsement of these organizations or their programs by CDC or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. CDC is not responsible for the content of pages found at these sites. URL addresses listed in MMWR were current as of the date of publication.

All MMWR HTML versions of articles are electronic conversions from typeset documents. This conversion might result in character translation or format errors in the HTML version. Users are referred to the electronic PDF version (http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr) and/or the original MMWR paper copy for printable versions of official text, figures, and tables. An original paper copy of this issue can be obtained from the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office (GPO), Washington, DC 20402-9371; telephone: (202) 512-1800. Contact GPO for current prices.

**Questions or messages regarding errors in formatting should be addressed to mmwrq@cdc.gov.


View the original article here